Student Lead Classes:
Both M and J's lessons today were focused on pieces of poem's to illustrate their theme of the day. Interestingly enough, neither lead a discussion on a single poem, but instead resorted to student created pieces. I enjoyed M's lesson in particular because I felt like it set the tone for future classes to come. It's a wonderful idea to work on community like that before you expect your class to open up to one another, share their ideas and opinions, and work with each other - especially when it comes to their own writing. I can remember my own experience in high school when I was forced to share a poem I created with my peers, it was like putting my innards on display, a truly horrifying experience. I think these type of lessons also let students see what they're really capable of creating. I think students are too often intimidated when it comes to creating something of their own, particularly poetry. Society has placed poetry on this pedestal, and creating it almost seems unattainable and absolutely discouraging. I liked the use of these activities, that didn't reveal students too much, to illustrate the creativity and mastery of language and image within each of us. I would love to see this taking place in a high school class - I bet teachers would be amazed of what's within their students!
Wednesday, November 28, 2007
Sunday, November 18, 2007
Poetry Lesson Week 4
Riddle Me This
M and J's poetry discussions brought up interesting approaches to the same old song and dance. I loved J's use of riddles for his lesson, it's something I've never even considered. I think that the skills he was going for were met in a fun way, and it also illustrated a great way to get the students warmed up to poetry and close reading. M's approach to leading discussion was a refreshing idea, though a little odd to me at first. I've never really had such an experience before, but I think it turned out well. I wonder what high school students would feel like if we were to sit amongst them for discussion - what message would it send across? I can see myself doing such a thing, but wonder what it says about the authority I hold. It just got me thinking about how different we'll all structure classes, as we all have our own personalities and styles - it's nice to see them coming through in our teaching. J's lesson brought up my inner turmoil over close reading and analysis. These are skills that I think are important to teach, but I always question how far to take them. Sometimes I think it's just as important to appreciate a piece of writing, rather than tear it apart for some elusive meaning. Is there a line? Can it be crossed and then doubled back over again? Does analysis, literary criticism and interpretation take precedence over personal responses to a great piece of writing?
M and J's poetry discussions brought up interesting approaches to the same old song and dance. I loved J's use of riddles for his lesson, it's something I've never even considered. I think that the skills he was going for were met in a fun way, and it also illustrated a great way to get the students warmed up to poetry and close reading. M's approach to leading discussion was a refreshing idea, though a little odd to me at first. I've never really had such an experience before, but I think it turned out well. I wonder what high school students would feel like if we were to sit amongst them for discussion - what message would it send across? I can see myself doing such a thing, but wonder what it says about the authority I hold. It just got me thinking about how different we'll all structure classes, as we all have our own personalities and styles - it's nice to see them coming through in our teaching. J's lesson brought up my inner turmoil over close reading and analysis. These are skills that I think are important to teach, but I always question how far to take them. Sometimes I think it's just as important to appreciate a piece of writing, rather than tear it apart for some elusive meaning. Is there a line? Can it be crossed and then doubled back over again? Does analysis, literary criticism and interpretation take precedence over personal responses to a great piece of writing?
Poetry Lesson Week 2
S, R, and C's lessons brought up some interesting points through their strikingly different choices in poems. R and C chose to look at silly poems, aimed at middle schoolers. While I think that this was age appropriate, I wonder if these same poems can be used in high school as warm-ups to get the students into the poetry frame of mind, instead of just jumping right into a Whitman poem at 7:30 am. I thought R handled the unexpected well - something I don't feel like we're getting enough practice with while teaching our peers. S did a great job leading discussion on her Hughes poems, though I do question how much students in high school will have to say about poems from the get-go. I think she had a reserve of questions to spark discussion, but I think a little history might have to be ventured into as well to fully appreciate such poems. These lessons, S's and C's in particular, made me question the use of poet/author biographies while teaching. This was brought up to me in my own lesson, is the poet's life/background crucial to the poem? What would it mean if we didn't consider the author's perspective or probable explanation of the poem and solely went off of the words? What are the +/- to having such knowledge before looking at the poem? Does their meaning take precedent over out own? What if the two don't align? It's an issue I'm still torn between.
Poetry Lesson Week 1
The Old West vs. the Westside
L's and E's lessons went well, I enjoyed both avenues they ventured down. I particularly enjoyed L's lesson because of her humility (admitting of her past experiences with poetry, as well as her unfamiliarity with the genre), it served as a humble reminder. Sometimes I think the knowledge we think we should walk out of school with can be overwhelming - we're expected to know every little component of the subject of English. Her use of pre-constructed dittos, something we've been avoiding like the plague, helped me to realize that we can utilize resources. It seems like an obvious idea, but one that I think we've sometimes forget in our quest for creative lessons and assignments. E's exploration into a Native poem was an interesting choice of narrative, that she covered well, one I've never been exposed to in school. I think that it's important to study other cultures in our classes, but I think it's something that can't be done half-hazardly. Too often I think multicultural literature gets thrown in for "flavor" in overwhelmingly white curriculum (as has been my experience)- how do we approach such literature? To clarify, how do we select which cultures to incorporate into the curriculum? How do we deal with the possibility of our multicultural students being viewed as the token representative of their culture? These may be easy to answers questions, but are still areas of gray to me.
L's and E's lessons went well, I enjoyed both avenues they ventured down. I particularly enjoyed L's lesson because of her humility (admitting of her past experiences with poetry, as well as her unfamiliarity with the genre), it served as a humble reminder. Sometimes I think the knowledge we think we should walk out of school with can be overwhelming - we're expected to know every little component of the subject of English. Her use of pre-constructed dittos, something we've been avoiding like the plague, helped me to realize that we can utilize resources. It seems like an obvious idea, but one that I think we've sometimes forget in our quest for creative lessons and assignments. E's exploration into a Native poem was an interesting choice of narrative, that she covered well, one I've never been exposed to in school. I think that it's important to study other cultures in our classes, but I think it's something that can't be done half-hazardly. Too often I think multicultural literature gets thrown in for "flavor" in overwhelmingly white curriculum (as has been my experience)- how do we approach such literature? To clarify, how do we select which cultures to incorporate into the curriculum? How do we deal with the possibility of our multicultural students being viewed as the token representative of their culture? These may be easy to answers questions, but are still areas of gray to me.
Sunday, November 11, 2007
Bukowski on Poetry
I think this lesson went fairly well,though not necessarily according to plan...
What I think I could have improved on:
What I think I could have improved on:
- My directions for the Tea Party activity - I could have modeled how I wanted students to utilize the notecards (I think there was miscommunication, as you guys started to order yourself with your cards)
- I think I should have played Bukowski reading the poem instead of having a student read it - what would this imply? Did it really matter since I didn't follow up with the discussion questions I thought I would?
- I always have rough beginnings easing into the role of teacher in front of you guys, I think I would behave different in front of high school students because I wouldn't feel as awkward
- I don't think I ought to "censor" myself, but I think that some things I say need more explanation for a high school audience - "taboo male fantasy", "misogynist", "poet laureate of skid row", etc.
- I wish I would have done something with the classroom physically to fit with the discussion that was taking place between students verbally; although our class has no problem debating with one another, it may be more difficult for high school students to respond to faces/voices they can't see
- the discussion! I had no idea the class was going to get so into the poem. I'm glad I didn't drop it in favor of an actual beat poem
- I was surprised at how well I actually followed the discussion taking place, I didn't know I had it in me to take in so many points of view at once
- I discovered just how comfortable I am with conflicting and heated view points
- Getting the students up and active with poetry, instead of sitting in their desks for traditional discussion
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
